People stretch so far beyond logic and reason in their attempt to prove that God doesn't exist. But the more amazing thing is, other people blindly believe the lies and half truths without a second thought! Amazing.
One such logic error is this... In the evolution supporting thought process is a grave fundamental logic error where they claim "if it could, it did". Meaning... If any process for evolution can be proven that it could happen, it must have happened. That is an outright lies there are two burdens of proof here, not one.
First prove that something COULD happen
Then prove that it DID happen
The first in no way proves the second, only allow the second to be considered. The first on its own only present opportunity, not incidence. But that fact it totally ignored in evolutionary thought. The scientists behind evolutionary thought are not seeking the truth, they have already made the assumption that evolution is how life began, now they are searching for ways to prove their decision, which was not based on fact.
Take darwin himself. He was on a personal to prove that there is no God (becasue of the experience with his daughter) , so he goes on a life mission of looking for an alternate reality. He must find a way that life could have began without God. His goal is to disprove God, not find truth. He is already skewed. What he comes up with is a plan of how life "could" have evolved without God. But he never took one step to prove that what could have happened by his theory actually happened. He just assumes that if he presents another possibility, it will be blindly accepted as fact.
And it was.
To this day, not one scrap of evidence exists for what "did" happen, only theories of how it "could have" happened. In fact, a logical look at the historical evidence brings one to the conclusion that only the biblical view is supported. But even when you twist this evidence by a foundation of no God, you only arrive at "if god doesn't exist, here is an alternative that makes some sense". But that doesn't prove that the alternative happened, only at best an alternative.
So be wary of these sort of illogical assumptions. They are rampant in science today.
Even proving what could have been, wouldn't prove that it was.
But.. By the way. Science is falling further and further behind in even proving what could have been, as more and more evidence refutes the possibility of evolution. But that's another blog post.
